FED2K Sides with the Islamofacists?  Banned for Islamophobia

Look at the above ban.  This is an exact screenshot on September 12, 2006.  Does it say 24 hours?  No, it doesn't.  No one told me I had a 24 hour ban, and I rightly assumed it was permanent.  And to this moment, I do not believe it was originally 24 hours.  Whoever went out of their way to type "Blatant Islamophobia" could have stated it was 24 hours, but they did not, nor was I warned or informed at all...i was simply BANNED.  So on what basis should I assume it was 24 hours?  If you logged in and saw the above ban, would you assume it was 24 hours?  Because I rightly believed I had a permanent ban, I opened a 2nd account and broke the rules because, frankly, I was stunned that I would just be arbitrarily banned like that without warning or notice.  I also emailed 2 of the mods about the ban, including Gob.  Only then was my ban "changed" to 24 hours (that is my belief), then 7 days (for creating a second account, which is not my gripe...my gripe is the reason for the first ban).  Well, at this point the ban is lifted on 20 Sep and they have let me back in the site.  But I have no desire to post there again until my condition is met as described below, so you wont be able to email me at Fed2K anymore.  Getting banned for "islamophobia" by leftist moderators who are too weak minded to tolerate heated dialogue on a philosophy and religion forum has stopped me from being able to visit the site with any sense of confidence that my posts will not be deleted.   I served that site and the community for years and in one fell swoop of radical leftism, I was thrown out the door.  There was no warning!  None, zippo.  I figured that I at least earned a tidbit of loyalty.  Maybe a mod could have responded to the post with a concern....or lock the post....heck, the hyper-sensitive mod could have PM'ed me...but none of that was taken!  My post was DELETED and my account BANNED.   That's loyalty for you!  But if anyone knows me, I do not go down silently.  I will not just lie down and allow radical leftism to silence me.  Like everyone else at dune2k who doesn't live under Sharia law, I have a free voice, and I am going to use it.  They can censor me over there, but not here.  Here I will say exactly what I intend to say.

I do not run the fed2k forums and have no authority over what goes on there.  But I also cannot return until I have confidence that the mods have been instructed to allow criticisms of Islam, the faith, not simply how a few Muslims interpret the teachings, but the entire faith as a whole.  I do not presuppose that Islam, the Faith, is non-violent and peaceful, in fact I suppose the opposite, that it is violent.  I also believe muslims who condone the forcible spread of their religion to be sub-human animals living in the 7th century. Violence to spread religion is intolerable and under the guise of "political correctness" westerners are turning a blind eye towards the systemic world view richly saturated in Islam that violence and war are legitimate methods of keeping Islam pure, and spreading it accross the earth.   I recognize that not all Muslims are violent or condone violence, but they are not true followers of Mohammad, since Mohammad did commit and condone violence to spread the faith.  If someone is to emulate Mohammad, that person would have to commit violence. You cannot claim to be "like Mohammad" and never commit violence. Since Mohammad himself comitted violence....to be like Mohammad therefore means that violence is acceptable. To those Muslims who view violence as unacceptable, they are not being like Mohammad. Comapre this to Jesus and Ghandi. To be like Jesus is NOT to commit violence (Since Jesus never commited violence). To be like Ghanid is NOT to commit violence. To be like Buddah is NOT to commit violence. But to be like Mohammad IS to commit violence. You see, unlike Jesus, Buddah, Ghandi....Mohammad is the only one in that group that raised high that killed people. Mohammad raised high the sword, and brought it down in a sea of red. This is in stark contrast to Jesus, Ghandi, or Buddah.  If the pope himself was a member of FED2k, he, too, would have gotten banned by the leftist mods at FED2k for islamophobia.   I will not accept that a condition to post on FED2k is that I must presuppose Islam to be a Religion of Peace.  Absolutely not.  Those in Islam that commit violence and condone violence in the spread of their faith are Islamofacists, and they are barbarians....animals.  You want to see what Sharia law looks like? , here you go- a muslim animal - you will know exactly what I am talking about. That photo represents a woman being executed LEGALLY. So dont even try to compare a Christian or a Buddhist breaking the law to kill someone.....the difference is that there is no place on earth a Christian can kill someone without breaking a law....its illegal to commit violence!! Yet in numerous Muslim countries Muslims kill women barbarically, and do so FULLY LEGALLY, embraced by the law. Islamic societies are the only place on earth where a woman can be stoned to death...legally! Men can pick up rocks and stone a woman until she dies, then go home and eat dinner and laugh with friends, because no crime was committed. So when Rosie O'donnel says radical Christianity is as dangerous as radical Islam, she is being ignorant and insane.

There is no place on earth a Christian can stone a woman to death and not be sought after by the police, thrown in jail, tried in court, convicted of murder, and possibly executed. But Muslims under Sharia law can stone a woman to death, and do so with full support of the law. Disgusting! Yet that is the liberal left's "tolerance" of a barbaric system called "Sharia Law"

So Why Was I Banned?

The term that really offended the mods was "Muslim Animals".  No warning, no anything...just an outright ban.  Obviously from a hyper-sensitive socialist mod who enjoys tearing up conservative America and Christians, but goes out of his way to defend wife-beating, anti-semitic, violence-condoning Islamofacists.   Well Im sick of the left defending this vile cesspool of Islamofacism.  Im tired of the leftist media beating up on Israel and coming to the side of middle-eastern tyrants who shoot 70 year old nuns in the back in response to spoken words.  And then these radical leftists have the audacity blame the pope!  Can you believe it?!!  Yes, idiots all over the western world actually blame the pope for the mindless violence and destruction that followed from a spoken word.  Its unreal!  A grown man got a gun, deliberately aimed it at a 70 year old woman's backside, and deliberately pulled the trigger, purposefully killing her in cold blood....and yet according to socialist America-hating leftists, he couldn't help it.  Its not his fault...its the Pope's fault guys!    Respond to words with violence, and then blame the speaker, absolving the person who actually commits the violence of responsibility.  As absurd as that sounds, I'm sad to say there are actually people all over the world who think that.  And they are idiots.

And in a forum that claims itself to be "not for the timid" we have fragile, sensitive mods that issue ban sticks whenever someone ruffles their soft, colourful feathers.

Yes I did say that muslims who uphold violence to bring about their goal of sharia law are animals.  And I absolutely stand by my claim that Islam is not a peaceful religion.  It is peaceful only for non-muslims.  The religion teaches that physical force is acceptable in the spread of Islam.  I have read the Qu'ran and I assure you I know far more about what it and the Hadith teaches than any of them.  Muhammad was not a Ghandi.  He did not walk around in white robes converting people peacefully.  He raised high the sword and brought it down in a sea of red.  The pope was absolutely right!  Islam was originally spread by the sword.  Ghandi killed no one.  Muhammad killed thousands.  Jesus killed no one.  Muhammad killed thousands.  Buddah killed no one.  Muhammad killed thousands.  Need I go on?   What example did Muhammad set for other Muslims?  Simple:  war is permissible to remove infidels who resist the prophets teachings.    Of course, I could have this discussion over there, but they decided my views were too "harsh".  Well my views never strapped a bomb to anyone.  My views never hijacked a plane.  My views never issued Fatwas to kill people who drew cartoons.  My views never blew up a bus full of kids.  My views never conspired to blow up Toronto, or trains in England, or Spain.  My views do not forbid a synagogue or a Hindu temple in my country, nor do they forbid my freedom to say that Muhammad was a false prophet (compare to all Sharia law countries).  My views do not stone women to death for looking at another man wrong.  My views don't make attempts to annihilate Israel.  So, who's views are harsh?  I have a challenge to anyone who thinks Islam is a religion of peace:  PROVE IT.  If you think it is you are deceived.  It is only a religion of peace for Muslims.  There is no peace for the infidel!  And in case you don't know, the infidel is you and me....non Muslims.  We get no peace.  The Ameriphobia over at the www.dune2k.com philosophy forum is beyond belief.  They call it a "religion and philosophy" forum, but it is far from that!  Weak in the belly, these timid and fragile moderators would not know a real debate if it smacked them in the head.  They retreat into their safe forum bubble, and do not have to deal with real opposing arguments. 

The mods at dune2k's philosophy forum make sure that no one is offended.  What they do not realize is that their forum is full of offensive posts to people who are social conservatives.  When I and millions of others who share my conservative views read those posts and see images of swastikas superimposed over America, we get offended.  But guess what?  I can take it.  Its a religion and philosophy forum!  If you cannot handle the heat, then go somewhere else.  Sadly, the wrong people are modding.  They ban posters who make "offensive" posts.  Offensive to who?  To them of course!  They regularly permit posts that would offend 75% of the worlds Christians and millions of Americans, but don't you dare offend a Muslim (or them)!  Doh! In short, they just don't want to be "stirred" by anyone.  Its a safe, leftist forum, impervious to opposition.  For anyone who is a capitalist and pro-bush supporter, unless your posts are extremely mild and void of all emotion, you will see a ban stick from one of the ultra-sensitive, easily offended mods.  Sure, the leftist mods will permit a conservative capitalist to post, but they will not tolerate any passion or emotion from such a person.  They only permit passionate posts that conform to their worldview.  Anything else is "xenophobia", "homophobia", "islamophobia" or whatever other kind of crutch "phobia" they can think of to justify their intolerance and intellectual frailty.   But I have seen on that forum numerous insults against Bush, against America, against Capitalism, against Christianity, complete with Nazi and Hitler references.  My ban was for "blatant islamophobia"  I guess blatant ameriphobia is perfectly legit.

Bah!  That forum was always run by insecure kids with no tolerance for conservative views.  My mistake was that I thought they grew up by now. 

Until people are free to express views that offend, there cannot be true freedom

We cannot mask our own intolerance by throwing around terms like "hatemonger", or "xenophobia".  Simply because we do not like what we hear does not give us the right to silence.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO RESPOND TO ME, YOU CAN COMMENT ON MY FORUMS: http://www.songwave.com/restrictedrealm/phpbb2/  the philosophy section is open to the public.  And no, I do not ban people for xenophobia or ameriphobia.  I'm a big guy, I can actually take an opposing view point, even if it goes against my own beliefs.